Trending December 2023 # First Macbook Pro With Touch Bar Orders Ship, Deliver As Soon As Monday # Suggested January 2024 # Top 12 Popular

You are reading the article First Macbook Pro With Touch Bar Orders Ship, Deliver As Soon As Monday updated in December 2023 on the website We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested January 2024 First Macbook Pro With Touch Bar Orders Ship, Deliver As Soon As Monday

Apple has now started shipping the first new MacBook Pro with Touch Bar orders with the delivery notifications indicating that the laptops will arrive in people’s hands as soon as Monday, November 14.

Several 9to5Mac readers and others online report receiving shipping notifications from Apple and or UPS, as pictured above and below. All shipped orders we’ve seen so far are for 15-inch MacBook Pro models. Shipment alerts for the 13-inch units will likely follow soon.

Apple originally offered an estimated shipping timeframe of 2-3 weeks with the new MacBook Pro models that first went up for preorder on October 27 following the company’s unveiling.

However, this quickly slipped to 4-5 weeks as customers snatched up the first major design revision to the MacBook Pro in four years. The Apple Store is still reporting 4-5 week delivery times for new MacBook Pro with Touch Bar orders.

Here’s another 15-inch customer receiving shipment confirmation by UPS; often the courier beats Apple to posting the Shipped notifications on the tracking website.

— Andrew Rose (@andrewrose_) November 12, 2023

So far, we are yet to receive confirmation of shipments for 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar or non built-to-order 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar models. However, we expect all SKUs to be shipping shortly with deliveries across the week.

At its October event, Apple relaunched the MacBook Pro line with three new laptops, a cheaper $1499 13-inch laptop and two new MacBook Pro with the new Touch Bar. The former model has been available for some time but the focus is on the ‘revolutionary’ Touch Bar equipped machines.

Instead of physical function keys, the Touch Bar MacBook Pros feature a multitouch OLED screen where the function row usually resides on the keyboard.

This enables Apple to offer dynamic buttons, sliders and contextual widgets relevant to the app the user is currently interacting with on the primary display. We’ve walked through how this works in Apple’s apps already and third-party developers have also started announcing integration with their apps.

— Aaron Zollo (@Zollotech) November 12, 2023

All new MacBook Pro’s feature upgraded CPU and GPU options, 100% faster SSD read and write speeds, USB-C Thunderbolt 3 ports, a larger trackpad and improved speaker system housed in a 20% thinner and smaller chassis enclosure.

However, the new Pros have not been accepted by the community with open arms, far from it. The products have caused several controversies in the last few weeks. Most notably, Apple has removed all legacy IO (such as traditional USB-A ports, SD card reader and a HDMI port) in favour of Thunderbolt 3 USB-C ports.

The 13-inch MacBook Pro has two USB-C ports and the 15-inch model has four. Although the port is much more flexible than what it replaces, some people were upset with the transition as it means customers need to buy an array of dongles, adaptors and new cables in order to connect their new laptop with existing accessories. In response, Apple is holding a temporary sale of USB-C accessories on its website through the end of the year.

Apple has also been criticised for the lack of a 32 GB RAM option (Apple cited battery efficiency concerns) and the general price increases seen with the Touch Bar machines.

The new 13-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar starts from $1799; the 15-inch MacBook Pro with Touch Bar starts from $2399. In terms of buyer response, though, the new laptops are appear to be selling well. Apple announced that the new MacBook Pros set a record for online Apple Store sales and a third-party analytics firm said the new MacBooks bested the rest of the industry in just 5 days.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You're reading First Macbook Pro With Touch Bar Orders Ship, Deliver As Soon As Monday

With The Touch Bar, Apple Gives Us A Glimpse Into A Future Keyboardless Macbook

Apple have a proven track record of ardently pursuing their vision, no matter the cost. The latest MacBook Pro serves as another reminder that the company is wholly unimpressionable by outside opinions, keeping up the dream of more simplistic products with every iteration, all the while taking away your beloved USB ports or SD card slots.

The ends might be justifiable, but the means can regardless lead to frustration with the most patient customers and complete alienation of the more short-fused ones. This cycle repeats every other year, when Apple decides to roll out hardware that is often just a little ahead of the curve.

Much has been made of the MacBook Pro’s latest changing of guard in the USB department. For now, the story goes, Apple has simply done their homework and found USB-C to be the technology fit for the immediate future. But the days of all ports are numbered if rumours are to be believed, as Apple generally contends that less is more and wireless the ultimate endgame. It does not take a giant leap to draw that conclusion and granted its validity, focus on the port situation has drowned out another discussion we clearly need to have at this point: Apple plans to get rid of the physical keyboard, and with the launch of Touch Bar on MacBook Pro the process is well under way.

All along we have been thinking Apple is first and foremost concerned with slowly ridding their MacBook lines of ports without risking too much headwind, one generation at a time. We were not wrong, as evidenced by the 12″ MacBook featuring next to no ports and the new MacBook Pro seriously curtailing the Pro in the name (unless dongles).

Interestingly, major keyboard transformations of late, on any MacBook line, have been handled differently by most media outlets: Yes, they are reported on and sized up critically, but no, they are barely contextualized. Why are the gaps between each character key narrowing, why are the wobbly keys being replaced for Apple’s butterfly mechanics which permit less travel?

People paying attention to Apple’s patent filings will have heard of some of their patents for haptic touch surfaces pertaining to MacBook, but things have clearly not been reprised often enough and at times been discounted as outlandish under the banner that ‘not everything Apple patent they really want to release’. Suspending the discussion of the precise technology behind the keyboard (Force Touch will obviously play its part), I believe that with the release of the new MacBook Pro, a touch keyboard is no longer just in the realm of possibility but definitely happening, and fast at that. Apple’s latest arrival gives us more hints than ever about it, so here’s what I consider the three biggest of them:

Butterfly keys

Over the last years, Apple has dramatically reshaped the technology behind the MacBook’s keypad. The cost sunk on this by R&D alone are improbable to have been sanctioned solely for reasons of wanting a slightly thinner laptop once again. It quite literally goes deeper than that.

Butterfly technology is trickling down the MacBook lines and it is not a long shot to predict them supplant the remaining legacy keyboards before long. Not only does butterfly hog less vertical space in the machines, but it more crucially also takes a seemingly innocuous step towards the feeling of typing on a clean surface. Customers still get the traditional keyboard and yet butterfly tech is undeniably closing up on the iPad typing experience. To lean on the observable demise of the iPhone’s Home button, logic dictates the next MacBook could feature near flat keys – however still physically cut out – that harness Force Touch to emulate the feeling of key travel.

If this analogy holds water and we bring it to an end, the final step will be the removing of keys plus Force Touch for glass plus Force Touch, just like iPhone 8 will allegedly drop the Home button cutout altogether.

The growth of the trackpad

Why is that a sign for keys to slowly bite the dust you ask? Because simply put, the Force Touch trackpad has outsmarted physical keys in every respect. Mechanical keys cannot discern between various levels of pressure, they can’t tell if one or two fingers are placed on the surface. The list goes on, but if we skip forward to the bottom line, the fact of the matter is that we are witnessing a tug of war between the two input methods and the trackpad is winning.

It is by no means a coincidence that it happens to be another instance of a clean, buttonless surface being on the rise. Operating on the assumption that characters are eventually going to get stomped, the trackpad might merge with the keyboard and ceaselessly bleed into it.

Touch Bar

Call it the ultimate giveaway, the backbone of this article or the elephant in the room, what’s clear is that this is the most straightforward foray into glass panels replacing traditional parts of our keyboards. Its meaning and scope for future flat keyboards is self-evident.

Based on early reviews, Touch Bar is rated highly and will on any account wear on. The question is no longer if the feature is here to stay, but rather where Touch Bar will expand to next. If I were to put money on it, I would venture that the days of the physical space bar and cursor keys are probably numbered.

Why oh why, Apple?

If and when the trend towards a touch keyboard on MacBooks becomes more salient, speculation with respect to Apple’s ulterior motive will be rife. Since it is early days, there is only so much we can surmise right now. With that in mind, reasons for Apple to strive for a keyboard consisting of one single part are not far to seek, which brings us full circle back to Apple pursuing their product vision no matter what.

Think impermeability of the keyboard, think thinness, think about the same technology migrating over to iPad. For all we know, the only noticeable difference between iPad and MacBook could become whether you like one or two slates of glass on your product. Granted all of this is a couple of years away and the ideas not all new – but with the arrival of Touch Bar we now have all but certainty that it is going to happen. Touch Bar is only a precursor of much more fundamental change coming to MacBook, and it looks as though that change is approaching fast.

Can I Use Python As My First Programming Language? Why?

In today’s world, everyone is upgrading their skill by learning to program. As the market is challenging and competitive as well, knowing how to code gives you an upper edge in your workplace. However, selecting the best language is also a challenge to start with. Fortunately, Python has got your back.

But can Python serve as a suitable introduction to programming? This article will go into that very issue and examine the factors that contribute to Python’s appeal to novice programmers.

Let’s have a look at the following factors before opting for a programming language such as Python −

Python has raised its popularity since its introduction in 1991. Beginners should choose this high-level, interpreted language since it is simple to read and write. Python is surrounded everywhere. Whether it is data analysis, artificial intelligence, machine learning, or web development, Python has a major role to play here. A perfect choice for giant or small applications to start with.

Python has reached a greater height because of its straightforward and simple-to-read syntax. The program’s logic may easily be understood thanks to the indentation-based code layout. As a result, without becoming mired down in complicated grammar rules, you can pick up the fundamentals of Python rather quickly. Python is more user-friendly for beginners because its grammar is frequently compared to that of the English language.

For beginners starting to code, Python’s modular architecture is another benefit. Developers can save time and effort by using the language to create compact programs that can be applied to bigger projects. Complex software development is made simpler by Python’s great modularity, which enables you to build on prior work. The reuse of code is a tremendous choice for those studying the fundamentals of programming.

In addition to its simplicity and modularity, Python is common for its brilliant and lively community. This community is made up of programmers who collaborate and share knowledge, presenting beneficial sources and aid for beginners. You can discover a variety of online tutorials, forums, and documentation that makes studying and programming with Python plenty easier. Moreover, Python boasts a massive library of modules and packages that enable you to solve common coding troubles and create environment-friendly and high-quality code.

Python has turned out to be a well-known language for machine studying and facts research. Python has established itself as the go-to language for facts analysis, generally due to the fact of its sizable library and tool collection. Data evaluation libraries in the language, including Pandas, NumPy, and Matplotlib, make it simple to work with big datasets and current information visually. Complex machine-learning mannequin building is made simpler via Python’s machine-learning packages, such as TensorFlow and Scikit-learn.


Programming is a beneficial capability to have in the current digital era, and Python is a top-notch preference for freshmen who prefer to research programming. Python is a remarkable language to look up to due to the fact of its simple and simple-to-read syntax, modularity, and sizable community. It is a precious Genius to have in a variety of fields, from web development to statistics science and laptop learning, due to the fact of its popularity and adaptability. Python is absolutely a language to take into consideration if you’re thinking about gaining knowledge of code.

Gay Parents As Good As Straight Ones

Gay Parents As Good As Straight Ones MED prof’s finding comes as Supreme Court weighs same-sex marriage

MED’s Benjamin Siegel says that according to three decades of research, kids of gay parents are doing just fine. Photo by Melinda Green

When the Supreme Court took up the issue of gay marriage last month, Justice Antonin Scalia claimed that experts debate whether same-sex parents are bad for children.

“There’s considerable disagreement among sociologists as to what the consequences are of raising a child in a…single-sex family, whether that is harmful to the child or not,” Scalia declared.

Benjamin Siegel says Scalia’s contention is—not to get too technical—baloney.

Siegel, a School of Medicine professor of pediatrics, coauthored a report, published by the American Academy of Pediatrics the week before the court case, arguing that three decades of research concur that kids of gay parents are doing just fine.

“Many studies have demonstrated that children’s well-being is affected much more by their relationships with their parents, their parents’ sense of competence and security, and the presence of social and economic support for the family than by the gender or the sexual orientation of their parents,” Siegel writes with coauthor Ellen Perrin, a Tufts University professor of pediatrics and director of developmental and behavioral pediatrics.

In an interview with BU Today, Siegel acknowledges the limits of all this research: none of the studies has been a randomized, controlled trial—the Holy Grail of scientific investigation—and all studies of gay parenting are necessarily small, since there aren’t many gay parents. The report cites estimates that gay couples and single parents are raising almost two million American children.

Those caveats notwithstanding, “the preponderance of evidence” says Scalia’s fears are groundless, Siegel says. Does he expect the report to influence either the high court or state legislatures debating gay marriage and adoption? “That’s my hope,” he says, “and I must say, it’s not a political hope. It’s a scientific hope.…That it will put an end to questioning that people who are homosexual cannot raise children or be foster or adoptive parents.”

Siegel says in the Washington Post, one of several major media that picked up his report, that “we’re never going to get the perfect science, but what you have right now is good-enough science. The data we have right now are good enough to know what’s good for kids.”

The best study so far, Siegel tells BU Today, is the National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study, begun in 1986. The study has followed 154 lesbian mothers and recently checked in on 78 adolescent children, comparing the mothers’ and kids’ self-reported status against national standardized samples.

The lesbian mothers’ reports of their children “indicated that they had high levels of social, school/academic, and total competence and fewer social problems, rule-breaking, and aggressive and externalizing behavior compared with their age-matched counterparts,” Siegel and Perrin write. If you might expect parents to say that, consider their kids’ testimony: “The self-reported quality of life of the adolescents in this sample was similar to that reported by a comparable sample of adolescents with heterosexual parents.”

Siegel and Perrin’s report also cites three studies done in the United States and Europe—two involving lesbian mothers and the third one involving men and women whose adult children reported they’d had a parent involved in a same-sex relationship. Those studies similarly found no difference in outcomes for the children as compared with children of heterosexual parents.

A dissenting Australian study, Siegel and Perrin write, interviewed teachers of 58 children who’d been raised variously by married heterosexuals, unmarried heterosexuals living together, and gay parents living together. Even that study found mixed results (the children of gay parents did more poorly in language and math, but better in social studies and attitudes toward learning, for example). Moreover, most children in the study wound up with gay parents because their straight birth parents had divorced, “potentially adding to the children’s stress,” Siegel and Perrin write. And the Australian researchers suggested the gay couples’ children “were severely stigmatized in their schools and communities,” adding stress.

Siegel cites another antigay parenting study by a University of Texas researcher that has also been criticized for its methodology. The researcher compared children in happy heterosexual marriages with children whose parents divorced after a gay affair. The researcher has admitted that his scientific work and Catholic faith are inseparable; Catholic teaching denounces homosexual acts as sinful.

A university investigation cleared the researcher of scientific misconduct while sidestepping the question of flawed methods, leaving it “to debates that are currently under way in the academy.”

Explore Related Topics:

How To Set Textarea Scroll Bar To Bottom As A Default Using Javascript Jquery

The scrollTop property of HTML DOM elements is used to set or return the number of pixels of an elements content which is scrolled vertically. Suppose if the scroll bar is not generated by the content elements then the value of the scrollTop is zero.

In this article, we are going to learn how to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default using the JavaScript/jQuery.


The following is the syntax for the setting textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default using the JavaScript −

element.scrollTop = pixels Parameter

Pixels − Used to specify the number of pixels of the elements content which is to be scrolled vertically.


Follow the below-given steps to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default in JavaScript −

Step 1 − Let’s define the style for the textarea of the HTML Document which is going to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default. For a textarea element, we defined the height, width, background-color, color, and text-align.

Step 2 − Under the body section, we defined the heading, button and script elements.

Step 3 − For the button element, the scrollBar() method is defined. Using this method location will be set the textarea scroll bar to bottom.

Step 4 − In scrollBar() method, the id is mentioned clearly for which method functionality should be performed.

Step 5 − The scrollTop property is the HTML DOM property which is used to set the scroll bar to textarea.


In this example, we are going to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default with the help of JavaScript.

#textarea { height: 100px; width: 650px; text-align:justify; } Press here function scrollBar() { var content = document.getElementById(‘textarea’); content.scrollTop = content.scrollHeight; }

Using jQuery to Change the background color

Please follow the below-given steps to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default using jQuery:

Step 1 − The source of jQuery is defined under the Script section of the header tag.

Step 2 − The button element is declared, which will be set the textarea scroll bar to bottom when we press it.

Step 3 − Inside the Script section, we defined the jQuery functionality for the scrollTop method.

Step 4 − You can set the scroll bar to bottom as a default for a selected element by using the jQuery selector along with the scrollTop method.


In this example, we are going to set the textarea scroll bar to bottom as a default using jQuery.

#contentarea { height: 100px; width: 350px; background: yellow; color: blue; text-align:justify; } function contentscrollBar() { $(document).ready(function(){ var $content1 = $(‘#contentarea’); $content1.scrollTop($content1[0].scrollHeight); }); }


Why Mathematical Practices Matter As Much As The Content

I have a confession to make: at some point this year, I realized that there’s a difference between the teacher I would love to be and the teacher I currently am.

Most teachers want to do interdisciplinary projects, project-based learning and every other education phrase with the words “exploration” and “project” in it. Despite evidence to the contrary, their reality of having to teach directly to a standardized test (ultimately affecting their municipality’s perception of them) casts a longer shadow on them than even the bravest of us want to admit.

In math, the need to stand in front of the classroom particularly rings true, not just because of the stakes, but because of the long precedent set by previous math teachers to do exactly that.

Yet math teachers simultaneously know that, in order for students to solve problems on their own, we have to teach them not just the “what” but the “how.” “What” equals content, but I’m expanding the definition of “how” beyond simply learning skills and procedures. The “how” should be about how to help students think more critically about the problems in front of them.

In other words, the approaches and uses of the tools students learn in math matter just as much as the topics and situations in which they apply.

An Expanded Skillset

The Common Core State Standards seem to address this well with their seven mathematical practices, but if the practitioners of the CCSS do as we’ve done in the past, then we’ve missed another opportunity to fortify students’ knowledge of math. Whether they’re learning fractions, exponents or the distributive property, they have to learn how to approach mathematical problems.

For instance, would I rather my students learn how to find the slope of a linear relationship or how to make sense of the answer after they’ve figured it out? One might say you can’t make sense of the resulting quotient without actually finding the quotient, but I submit to you that, without making sense of the slope (either by explaining it or showing another representation), they won’t know whether the response they got actually made sense. Students ought to have the skills to self-correct, or at least think twice before looking at a response and moving on.

Simply finding the answer is only one part of math.

Now, unlike the topics (or content) we teach in math, teaching students how to approach a problem will feel more like a soft skill to teachers, in the same category as recognizing when a kid needs to go to the restroom or getting a student a tissue five seconds before you know they’ll sneeze all over the pencil you lent them. Teaching students how to disagree with another person’s argument carefully (and factually) or how to move on to the next problem without constantly checking with you (I’m still working on this) demands a certain dexterity from educators, and a consistent eye on making sure those sorts of behaviors flourish.

Rather than just trying to sift through our 800-page textbooks by chapter or blaze through a curriculum map, let’s focus on developing mathematicians. Many of the things we take for granted, like teaching students how to ask better questions or picking apart word problems, actually make students better at math.

Update the detailed information about First Macbook Pro With Touch Bar Orders Ship, Deliver As Soon As Monday on the website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!