You are reading the article Apple Needs An Oled Supplier, But Can It Sidestep Samsung? updated in February 2024 on the website Katfastfood.com. We hope that the information we have shared is helpful to you. If you find the content interesting and meaningful, please share it with your friends and continue to follow and support us for the latest updates. Suggested March 2024 Apple Needs An Oled Supplier, But Can It Sidestep Samsung?
Plastic OLED is about to come back in a big way
According to KGI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, Apple is likely to pay somewhere between $120 and $130 per OLED panel. A significant cost increase from the iPhone 7 Plus’ 5.5-inch LCD display, which was priced between $45 and $55. For reference, IHS Markit estimates that the display inside the Galaxy S8 only cost Samsung around $85.
While that’s not necessarily great news for Apple, this is a big win for Samsung. The company has been investing in its AMOLED mobile technology since the launch of the Galaxy S2, and shipments have risen substantially since then. Last year, mobile form factor OLED shipments game close to 400 million, up from 200 million in 2013. Samsung accounted for 97.1 percent of that market in Q1 2023.
Most of this has been driven by Samsung own smartphone sales, including the new Galaxy Note 8, but more and more mobile manufacturers have been picking up the technology too, boosting Samsung Display’s sales. OEMs include Meizu, Motorola, and vivo, to name just a few who have dabbled. Rumors suggest a deal has been struck with Apple for 70 to 100 million panels annually, which could see Samsung’s shipments approach the 500 million mark soon enough. Although that potentially means less supply for everyone else too.
The longer term issue for Apple and other OEMs looking to switch to OLED is that these prices are probably too high to make phones competitive on a mass scale. Many consumers and pundits are already arguing that $1,000 is too much for the Note 8, but without an alternative supplier, prices could be pushed up and up, as more OEMs compete for Samsung’s limited spare stock. What the market really needs is a reliable secondary supplier.
LG Display is the distant second player in smartphone OLED, but it’s one of the biggest companies and the best when it comes to TV sized panels, so it has the experience to develop industry leading mobile displays just like Samsung. LG’s handset division recently picked up the technology again for use in its new LG V30 flagship.
The issue is that LG Display’s production capacity is currently a way behind Samsung’s, with panel production expected to ramp up much more meaningfully from now and throughout 2023. The big question is, could LG cater to a medium sized major launch, say the much rumored premium iPhone 8, that might ship in more limited quantities?
From the display manufacturing point of view, being a big OLED panel supplier seems like a strong position to be in, with plenty of demand and the ability to attach a high price tag. This may change once manufacturers besides Samsung bring their production capabilities into full swing, but that’s probably a year off at best.
For product manufacturers, OLED is helping to differentiate products with interesting form factors and support for emerging technologies like HDR, but those aren’t necessarily open goals. For many customers, LCD or OLED doesn’t really factor into their purchasing decisions, it’s brand reputation and cost that makes the biggest differences.
With Apple now reportedly suffering from manufacturing delays due to trying to incorporate its Touch ID fingerprint scanning technology alongside a whole new display panel, there’s a risk that moving to OLED too quickly and paying over the odds could punish the company. A delayed launch or stock shortage is in nobody’s interests, yet Apple looks to be facing that all too familiar situation again.
POLED vs AMOLED: What is the difference between these OLED technologies?
Over the next couple of years, when OEMs have a little more choice in who to buy their OLED panels from, we may then see OLED take off in a big way. Until that time, it’s likely to remain mostly a premium flagship technology outside of Samsung, and one that consumers are going to have to pay to enjoy.
You're reading Apple Needs An Oled Supplier, But Can It Sidestep Samsung?
Apple has requested a court in New York to rule finally whether it can be compelled to assist investigators to get around the passcode of an iPhone 5s belonging to a defendant in a criminal case.
The Department of Justice, citing a statute called the All Writs Act, tried to get help from Apple to bypass the security of the phone in government possession.
Apple’s lawyer said in a letter to U.S. Magistrate Judge James Orenstein of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York that the company would like an order as it has received additional requests similar to the one underlying the case before the court.
The government had informed the court in October last year that Jun Feng, the accused in a methamphetamine possession and distribution case, had entered a guilty plea, but it said that its application to order Apple’s assistance to bypass his iPhone 5s passcode was not moot as the government was still looking for evidence from the device as part of a continuing investigation, and because the criminal defendant still had to be sentenced or a judgment entered.
Apple now also argues that the matter is not moot because “it is capable of repetition, yet evading review.” The question of whether a third party like Apple can be compelled to assist law enforcement in its investigative efforts by bypassing the security mechanisms on its device has been fully briefed and argued, according to the letter. “The Court is thus already in a position to render a decision on that question,” Apple said.
Judge Orenstein has not passed a final order for around three months, presumably to assess whether a decision is relevant in the wake of subsequent developments in the court.
The current thinking among some lawmakers and law enforcement agencies in the U.S. is also veering around to the view that companies should provide backdoors to investigators, so that they can get access to encrypted data on smartphones. Legislation introduced in California aims to require manufacturers of smartphones and operating system providers to provide such decryption support to law enforcement, while another in New York would ban the sale of encrypted phones.
The All Writs Act gives federal courts the authority to issue orders that are “necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.” But as the Electronic Frontier Foundation pointed out, the Act is “not a backdoor to bypass other laws” and the Supreme Court has set out limits to the Act, including requiring that a court cannot use it to bypass other laws or the Constitution, or require third parties to assist in ways that would be “unreasonably burdensome.”
Apple said it was possible to access certain types of unencrypted user data from the iPhone 5s phone running iOS 7, though it would not have been possible if it was a device running iOS 8 or higher. But it pointed out that the process, including possible testimony by Apple staff at trial, would be unnecessarily burdensome as the number of government requests increase.
The DOJ said that Apple had previously assisted investigators in federal criminal cases to extract data from password-locked iPhones under court orders. Apple said its previous acquiescence to judicial orders does not mean it consents to the process.
Windows 11’s design is amazing, but can we get it on more apps?
When people think of Windows 11, the first thing that comes to their minds is the new design.
This highly-coveted fluent appearance is what users want for all the software on their devices.
As you know, due to certain incompatibility reasons, some apps do not share this new aspect.
Users are coming up with new design concepts for some of the more popular apps, daily.
Even though there are so many aspects of the new operating system to be analyzed and discussed, ever since it became available for testing, everything seems to revolve around one main topic: aspect.
Windows 11 users state that their favorite element of the upcoming OS is by far the new fluent aspect.
There are, however, certain software choices that can’t adopt this new design style just yet, due to certain incompatibility issues.
This doesn’t stop people from wanting this design applied to all their favorite apps, and the ones that know their way around a PC to design concepts that deliver just that.
One thing is for sure, which is that this probably won’t stop until Microsoft takes heed of all these requests and delivers an OS that includes more of these popular demands.The Windows 11 design language is requested on more apps
First, let’s all understand what design language means. This is a more technical term that refers to an overarching scheme or style that guides the design of a complement of products or architectural settings.
In this case, since we are talking about Windows 11, it applies to the OS itself. To be more exact, Insiders that already took the future operating system for a spin want its fluent design, with rounded corners, applied to absolutely everything.
Throughout these weeks in which Windows 11 was available for testing via the Windows Insider program, we’ve witnessed different concepts and software solutions for applying this much-coveted design to more and more apps.
As you can remember, we’ve discussed bringing the Windows 11 specific fluent design to Steam, and we’ve also explored how different coding software would present itself under the same aspect.
But that now that everyone has got a taste of this new style, it will be hard to stop. And with new concepts surfacing every day, soon enough Microsoft will have to find a way of making every app compatible design-wise.
Daily, specific forums and social media platforms are absolutely bombarded with new ideas on how to bring the fluent style to our most used applications.
In the screenshot above, you can see the design concept for Adobe XD, one of the more popular apps that users have requested to be redesigned according to Windows 11 standards.
The list is vast, as you can imagine because everyone wants to be able to use their favorite applications and be visually pleased, further enhancing the feeling of using new software.
You’ve probably also asked yourself the following question: what’s with all the hype about this new Windows design?
Well, the answer is pretty simple and it has to do with the way we perceive change and react to it. Of course, after using a certain UI for so long, a newly re-designed, better-looking one will certainly be far more appealing.
Furthermore, there has been a lot of talk during these years in which we used Windows 10, about how other operating systems such as macOS, look far better than Windows ever did.
And Microsoft did have a plan to give the OS a complete makeover with the Sun Valley project, but it seems that they’ve just decided to offer us a completely new experience instead.
Here’s a design element that proves to be even better looking than the one that Microsoft chose. Another one of the more tech-savvy Windows 11 users has decided to reshape the minimize, maximize and close buttons on windows.
This makes the buttons look like on Windows XP and you can see what this looks like in the screenshot below. However, not everyone agreed with this new choice, calling the new button appearance childish and impractical.
There seems to be a fine line on how much one can actually tweak the new OS, using these fluent design elements, before it starts becoming tacky and forced.
However, this isn’t really about the built-in elements that Windows comes with as a package. What users really desire is for this design language to be applied to their favorite software.
And believe us when we tell you, that list is a long one. But these are not outrageous demands, as it would feel normal for downloaded and installed software to take the same aspect as the OS it runs on.
This will make the certain app feel like a system native and create an overall harmony of shapes that will surely delight users.
The important thing to remember is that Windows 11 is still in its beta testing phase and it can’t be labeled as a complete experience.
Most likely, when it will be declared a stable and full product, such features will be included in the very fabric of the OS.
Was this page helpful?
Start a conversation
The definition is in its name. An XSS attack is executed by modifying a URL in a way that can allow certain scripts to be injected into it. For example, you can make an entirely different website show up within a frame of the URL’s destination.
Look at an example of the modified URL:How Does XSS Affect You?
XSS can be used in a variety of ways. Some may just post a link on Twitter containing the malicious URL. Twitter does half the work for them by covering up the URL partially. Contextual links within untrustworthy blogs and websites may contain URLs that are masked by the “anchor text” (which is another fancy way of describing text that’s underlined and blue).
XSS can also be used to trace you by installing cookies on your computer without your consent. Gathering this data could allow hackers to better understand a “digital demographic” of the people they are targeting for future malware infections. In such a case, you might not even notice anything going on in your computer or mobile device at all.How Dangerous Is XSS?
All things considered, XSS isn’t usually very dangerous. It may be annoying, but it won’t present any long term consequences, at least not in the short term. However, beware of combinations between XSS attacks and other sorts of malicious behavior!
For example, let’s say that Facebook is vulnerable to XSS. A hacker can easily inject a fake log-in page to Facebook’s URL. You’d log in successfully (since the fake page can send your credentials to both Facebook and its own database), but the hacker will now have your username and password. This is where the true danger of XSS presents itself.How To Protect Yourself Against XSS
If you have a website you’re developing yourself, read this cheat sheet. This will protect you and your visitors from XSS. Be sure to mail the cheat sheet to any web developers you know. They’d appreciate it.
Miguel has been a business growth and technology expert for more than a decade and has written software for even longer. From his little castle in Romania, he presents cold and analytical perspectives to things that affect the tech world.
Subscribe to our newsletter!
Our latest tutorials delivered straight to your inbox
Sign up for all newsletters.
Picture quality might be as neck and neck as they have ever been, with Samsung bringing their A-game to contend with the historically well regarded Apple picture quality. Images captures with either camera have great color reproduction, and details in all but the dimmest of situations remain well captured. Sharpness is at its best in these newest versions of their respective lines, and it seems Samsung has opted to keep noise reduction to a minimum, so pictures are more accurately depicted, rather than smudged out by bad post processing.
iPhone 6 Plus camera samples
Low light performance favors the Samsung Galaxy S6, as it manages to get good detail without too much noise in plenty of darker situations, though some fiddling with the exposure compensation will be needed to keep things from going uneven. As Samsung further closes the gap in camera quality since the great performer of the Galaxy Note 4, it seems the only real problem the iPhone has here is a smaller sensor at 8 MP, as the Galaxy S6 demonstrates that its larger 16 megapixels sensor captures a bit more detail for its better post processing to work on.
You won’t have a bad time with either of these cameras when it comes to quality. For shooting options, both provide some compelling versions of their own creative modes, but if what you want is more freedom in catering your shot, the Galaxy S6 is definitely the better choice.
In software, we get some key enhancements in both versions of these respective interfaces, with one updating its look a bit, and the other finally getting the speed boost we’ve been waiting for.
Starting with the iPhones, the Apple OS got a pretty significant upgrade in iOS 7, continuing to bring its control center for easy access to settings, a notification dropdown for stocks, scheduling, and general happenings, and a more holo-like look all around that has helped keep the long standing operating system from looking too long in the tooth. Granted, there have been updates to iOS 8 recently, but these updates focus mainly on the Apple Watch and a new suite of health applications that we have yet to really put through its paces. All in all, iOS veterans remain satisfied with their flavor of smartphone operating system, even with its lack of an app drawer, a mainstay of Android.
On the back of the newest version of Android, Touchwiz has finally received the update that we’ve been waiting for. Coupled with the in-house processing package in the Exynos 7420, this version of the Samsung interface is both smoother and slimmer. Many of the different features that cluttered the operating system in the past are no longer here, like the air gestures. Some of the special features like the MultiWindow and the S Window do remain, albeit without the annoying tutorials all over the place that used to push these capabilities in the user’s face.
Samsung’s UI does get some aesthetic changes as well, including a few new transitions and effects that are somewhat akin to the ones found originally in iOS, but they also suit this version of Touchwiz very well. S Health itself has been updated, though how it stacks up against the medical suite in iOS remains to be seen. Ultimately, the Galaxy S6 is a phone that takes the Lollipop enhancements and puts its own flavor on it. With the Galaxy S6 and the latest Touchwiz you finally get a proper, reliable experience from Samsung’s UI, which of course, can be bolstered by extra features if you want them, by digging a little deeper.
Ultimately you will already know which of these operating system suits you. Apps and capabilities between them are largely the same, unless you’re looking to multitask the Samsung way, but in the end the main story here is how Samsung has really done something great with their UI
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED review
We test & review the ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED tablet / convertible laptop device
The ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED is yet another pioneering device from the most innovative laptop manufacturer out there, who have spoiled us this year with new iterations of various interesting designs like the ASUS ROG Flow X16, ASUS ROG Flow Z13, and the ASUS Zenbook 14X OLED Space Edition.
The Zenbook 17 Fold OLED is the largest foldable OLED display device currently available, and the Taiwanese company has had to overcome various technical challenges in order to make it a reality. It can switch between a 17.3-inch, 4:3 2560 x 1920 tablet and a 12.5-inch, 3:2 1920 x 1280 laptop with detachable keyboard, as well as various other partially folded configurations depending on your needs.
The uniqueness of this tablet/laptop on the market does mean however that it fetches a very high price. The question is, is it worth the money? Let’s find out.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED
Intel Core i7-1250U
Intel Iris Xe (iGPU)
1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0
17.3″ / 12.5”
Max Refresh Rate
Specifications & upgradability
Intel Core i7-1250U
Intel Iris Xe (iGPU)
1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0
17.3″ / 12.5”
Max Refresh Rate
4:3 2560 x 1920 / 3:2 1920 x 1280
5MP & HD InfraRed
3.31lb / 1.50kg
2x Thunderbolt 4 (65W power delivery), 1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack
unique foldable design
OLED display with unbeatable contrast & blackpoint
good peak brightness
good sRGB & DCI-P3 color accuracy & gamut
good panel uniformity
great battery life
great build quality
Useful software features & efficiencies
screen too soft for most styluses
underpowered i7-1250U CPU and Iris Xe iGPU
extremely expensive considering the core components
not enough ports
detached keyboard lacks angled stand
central fold visible unless viewed straight on
The 16GB LPDDR5 RAM that comes with every device is soldered on, which unfortunately means upgrading the memory is not possible. The standard 1TB M.2 SSD can however be upgraded down the line, should you wish, potentially up to something as high as 8TB from what we gather. The device comes with a WiFi 6E card.
The highest CPU option available is the Intel Core i7-1250U, a 12th gen U-Series processor designed specifically for convertible thin-and-light laptops and tablets. Given it’s limited to only 2 Performance cores and 8 efficiency cores, don’t expect much in the way of processing power compared to powerful devices like the Flow X16, Flow Z13, and Zenbook 14X OLED, which come with ‘full-size’ laptop CPUs. It would have been nice to see at least a more performance-focused P-series ultralight 12th gen CPU (which come with more cores and higher power allocation than the U-series), and this loadout is somewhat disappointing. Unsurprisingly for a tablet, there is no dedicated graphics card, and the GPU is an integrated Intel Iris Xe model.
Software features & OS
The ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED uses Windows 11 and you can utilize all of the gestures common to other Windows 11 touchscreen devices.
The ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED is a smart-looking device. When folded up, the exterior of the tablet is half covered by a faux leather wrap-around with a dark greyish blue color, which serves to protect the hinge mechanism and contains the kickstand. This binding makes the device resemble a nice office binder/notebook, as does the faux leather protective travel case it comes with (with magnetized flap).
The uncovered section of the top/front of the folded tablet has a pleasing reflective surface, with a dark metallic tint, and a strange optical illusion effect that makes it look slightly concave from certain angles. The Starfleet-esque ASUS triangle logo is also present on this section, and the whole thing looks very tasteful and certainly office suitable. The metallic surface does attract a lot of smudges though, as is typical for this sort of material in other devices.
When you open up the Zenbook 17 Fold, the interior bezel of the device has an unusual soft matte rubberized feel, almost feeling like suede fabric. It’s a fairly mid-sized bezel, but compared to the size of the display it looks fairly unobtrusive.
The wrist rest area of the keyboard around the trackpad is made of the same faux leather as the binding of the tablet, with the plastic keys and trackpad being of a slightly darker shade.
There is no RGB on the tablet, and besides the display itself, the only light source comes from the small power/charging lights of the tablet and detachable keyboard.
Size, build quality & ergonomics
The dimensions of the ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED are as follows:
Looking at the weight now:
tablet: 1.60kg / 3.53lb , tablet & keyboard: 2.00kg / 4.4lb
The Zenbook 17 Fold OLED isn’t exactly light compared to devices like the Surface Pro or iPad, but we wouldn’t call it heavy either, and it’s pretty impressive how portable it is and how nicely it all fits together (keyboard included) – easily transportable in a small bag.
When the kickstand is fully opened up the tablet leans back at about a 40 degree angle. The stand can be brought closer to the laptop, making the screen stand more upright (i.e. closer to a vertical position), though depending on the angle you have it at it’s not always stable if you happen to knock the device.
Overall the build quality is superb, like virtually all ASUS devices. The obvious vulnerable area (the bend in the middle of the screen) still manages to feel relatively sturdy, and ASUS claims it’s good for about 30,000 folds, which it equates to probably five years use if you’re opening and closing it about fifteen times per day. Of course, this is difficult to tell in a review copy, and we’ll have to wait and see how buyers report back on durability over the coming years.
The one downside in build quality terms is the softness of the screen itself. As we will discuss later, the material ASUS have had to use for the foldable OLED panel they’ve used is too soft to be used with most styluses, which implies it will be very easy to scratch and damage. This is a machine that will require handling with care, particularly given its very high asking price.
Keyboard & trackpad
The Asus Fold bluetooth Keyboard is specifically designed for ASUS Zenbook Fold devices, and has the magnetic clip-on feature already discussed above.
The function keys along the top of the keyboard include a button to enable/disable the touchpad, to project the screen to another device (with PC screen only, Duplicate, Extend, or Second Screen only options), a Bluetooth settings shortcut, two shortcut buttons you can bind to different Bluetooth devices, a Snipping Tool shortcut, and a MyASUS shortcut.
The Bluetooth shortcuts are particularly useful, as you can pair the keyboard with something like your smart TV say, and easily switch between using it for your Zenbook 17 FOLD and your television with the touch of a button, then back again.
The keyboard is nice to use when magnetically attached to the device, feels good to type on, but is definitely lacking some sort of retractable stand/feet to angle it upwards when disconnected, as typing fully flat feels a bit uncomfortable after a while.
Alternatively, you can also use the on-screen keyboard with Windows 11, if you prefer touchpad functionality.
Can you use a stylus on the ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED?
The official line from ASUS is that the foldable OLED display they’ve used is too soft to be used in conjunction with a stylus, which is a big disappointment in our eyes as this significantly reduces the potential functionality of this device for graphic artists and the like.
You could possibly get away with using a softer, capacitative stylus, however ASUS specifically requested we did not test it with one, so we cannot know for sure whether this is the case.
Hopefully, as ASUS (or a competitor) develop this technology further, we’ll see foldable OLED devices down the line where stylus use is feasible.
Webcam & microphone
The Zenbook 17 Fold OLED has a 5MP camera of about the same quality as a Microsoft Surface Pro X (though worse than that of an iPad Pro). It’s capable of up to 1080p 16:9 30FPS video recording, or 4.9MP 4:3 2560 x 1920 / 3.7MP 16:9 2560 x 1440 photographs.
For some reason in our test the 16:9 video was stuck in portrait when the device was in laptop mode, only switching to landscape when it was turned on its side. We hope this will be resolved in a future software update, as the portrait view whilst in laptop mode doesn’t make the most sense. The change in orientation to the 17.3” 4:3 screen does also seem to reduce the effectiveness of the microphone pickup somewhat, so it’s clearly positioned to be best used in laptop mode.
Both the webcam and microphone were of a good quality when we tested them. There was an audible hiss/hum picked up on the standard microphone mode, but when we enabled Single presenter conference call mode under the AI noise-canceling settings within MyASUS, this was completely removed.
In addition to the main 5MP camera there is also the HD Infrared camera and color sensor, which allow for Windows Hello security features, as well as the AdaptiveLock features already discussed above (under Software). The color sensor also allows for automatic color temperature changes on the display, depending on the ambient light of your surroundings.
Ports & sockets
Ports and sockets are limited to a 3.5mm audio combo jack and two Thunderbolt 4 USB-C ports (both with up to 65W charging support and display output). One of the USB-C ports lies on the bottom right side of the display when it’s in laptop mode, the second is on the top left of the top bezel.
This is more than you get with an iPad or iPad Pro, though these are considerably cheaper devices. Considering the price point of the Zenbook 17 Fold OLED we would have liked to have seen a USB-A 3.2 port (as can be found on the ASUS ROG Flow Z13) and possibly even a mini-SD card reader, which can be found on 14-inch laptop devices like the ASUS Zenbook 14X OLED Space Edition. You do at least get a USB-A to USB-C adapter (female to male) is included to help you use any USB-A peripherals you might have.
ASUS is one of the better Windows laptop manufacturers when it comes to audio quality, and the speakers of the Zenbook 17 Fold OLED are at least as good as those of a Microsoft Surface Pro. There are speaker grills located on the top edge, left edge, and front edge facing the user when the Zenbook 17 Fold is placed into laptop mode. The restrictions of the tablet chassis do mean they don’t match up to other (more laptop-like) ASUS offerings like the ROG Flow X16 though: there’s even less bass replication, the sound is a bit more muffled, and audio quality suffers more at high volumes. Still, the max volume is pretty high for a tablet.
The speakers of the ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED are not quite as good as those of an iPad Pro 2023 say, which is unsurprising given Apple’s dominance when it comes to the audio quality of their portable devices.
We conducted our usual battery test on the Zenbook 17 Fold OLED in both Tablet mode (fully unfolded) and in Laptop mode with the detachable keyboard attached to the device.
Within MyASUS we set the fan speed profile to Whisper mode, with AI Noise-Canceling and Tru2Life video sharpening both turned off. Target Mode (which dims the brightness of any window on your screen that isn’t currently active, saving power and improving the longevity of your display) is a setting that can definitely improve your battery life in real-world use, however given our test is performed with only single active windows open anyway, we disabled it.
Similarly, we disabled all of the AdaptiveLock settings during the Laptop mode test (the only time they can be activated), so as to make the test fair, although Walk-Away Lock and certainly Look-Away Screen Dimming would be sure to improve battery duration in general use.
We switched all background applications off, where possible played two hours of fullscreen YouTube, and then spent the rest web browsing and typing on GoogleDocs. The brightness was set to 63%, throughout which is the equivalent on this device of 120 cd/m² – the recommended brightness for indoor, daytime use (more on this later).
Tablet mode (17.3″) – c.8.5 hours
Laptop mode (12.5”) – c.9.5 hours
Considering this is an OLED display, the battery results are reasonably impressive, particularly for the fully unfurled 17.3” tablet mode. It’s not completely surprising, given the relatively underpowered CPU, however they’re still quite respectable.
That being said, we did not use any touch screen functionality in our battery test. Using the touchscreen keyboard in Windows 11 for instance would almost certainly sap the battery life of the tablet faster.
Although we didn’t properly test its battery duration, as mentioned the trackpad of the detachable keyboard did seem to perform less responsively as time went on until it was recharged.
The OLED screen of the ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold is quite glossy and reflective, though the high brightness (more on this later) does help to combat this.
When in laptop mode, the display looks like that of any other OLED 12.5” laptop, but when unfolded to its full-size, there is a fairly noticeable band down the centera long the fold line. If you’re looking at this dead on it’s not very noticeable, though from any other slight angle it becomes fairly apparent, which may put some people off who want to use the device in office/screen-sharing settings. You do get used to it however, and the contents of the screen are still legible.
This is not a gaming device, so the 60Hz maximum refresh rate of the display is pretty standard. The display has the typical very high response time of OLED displays (around 0.2ms), however given the 60Hz cap there’s not a massive amount of utility in this.
We conducted all of the following color, contrast, and brightness tests with the screen unfolded to its full size, propped up using the kickstand. We tested the device on three of the different color gamut presets available within MyASUS (sRGB, DCI-P3, and Display P3, which apparently combines the first two for a still wider gamut), which is a relatively unique feature, and one that color professionals will no doubt find useful.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED sRGB color gamut results
ASUS claims that the display covers over 100% of the sRGB spectrum, and 100% DCI-P3. We tested these claims for all three color gamut presets, and got the following results. As you can see, the sRGB gamut almost hits near enough hits 100% for each, scoring 98.8%, 99.7%, and 99.7% respectively. The DCI-P3 results fell a bit short, scoring a maximum of 97.2% under the DCI-P3 and Display P3 presets, however for most users this would be close enough to work in this spectrum.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED DCI-P3 color gamut results
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED Display P3 color gamut results
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED color accuracy before calibration
sRGB profile results: 6768K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 1.78 (average deltaE*00), 2.35 (gamma).
DCI-P3 profile results: 6716K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 1.76 (average deltaE*00), 2.76 (gamma).
Display P3 profile results: 6805K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 2.49 (average deltaE*00), 2.35 (gamma).
As is expected from an OLED display, the Black point and Contrast ratio were perfect on each of the three different presets. White point and gamma were less than ideal, but not bad, and the all-important average deltaE values for each were very impressive. We’d definitely recommend using the sRGB profile if you’re doing color-accurate work in this space, the DCI-P3 profile for color-accurate work in that gamut, and perhaps consider the Display P3 setting for watching films and the like.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED color accuracy post-calibration
Although it’s often unnecessary, we like to see what a quick calibration can squeeze out of a display. In each case calibration only worsened the color accuracy results, and often the white point also. Black point and contrast remained the same, though there was an improvement in the gamma each time towards the 2.2 ideal. Overall there’s no reason to further calibrate the display, unless you have a really specific need to improve the gamma.
sRGB profile, post further calibration: 6350K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 3.04 (average deltaE*00), 2.15 (gamma).
DCI-P3 profile, post further calibration: 6723K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 2.19 (average deltaE*00), 2.19 (gamma).
Display P3 profile, post further calibration: 6763K (White point), 0/m² (Black point), infinity:1 (Contrast ratio), 3.15 (average deltaE*00), 2.16 (gamma).
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED panel uniformity
We do a panel uniformity test on all laptops we review after their calibration, which tests for both luminance and color accuracy. We start on the centremost point as a reference and then test all the other sections of the screen (25 in total) to see how they compare.
Generally, any average color variation under 1.00 is good and shows up as green in the image above, though the average consumer won’t be able to tell much difference below 3.00. Visual editors who work with color however may have a keener eye.
The results we got on the Zenbook 17 Fold OLED were very good. Most variation was below 1.00 average delta (in green), with only the two segments in the top right showing a maximum variance of 2.19 and 2.68 (in yellow). This means that the untrained eye likely will notice no variation at all on the screen, with color-trained professionals being able to detect slight discrepancies in the top right. Still, this particular result is good enough for the vast majority of creatives to work with unless they’re operating at the very high end of professional standards.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED brightness
When using the laptop indoors during the daytime we’d recommend matching the brightness to 120 cd/m² which equates to a brightness setting of 63% under the brightness controls for this laptop.
The ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED is a unique and impressive device, but its enormous price tag (just under $4,000 on launch in the US, and £3,300 in the UK) combined with the lack of stylus support will mean it won’t be of interest to the majority of users. It does have good color replication in sRGB and DCI-P3 ranges, as well as color accuracy and panel uniformity good enough for professionals to work with, which may entice some, but the relatively weak processor means you won’t be able to do much in the way of demanding render workflows or the like. Still, if you’ve got deep pockets the novelty of this device may just swing it for you, and we’re excited to see where ASUS takes the technology next.
ASUS Zenbook 17 Fold OLED
Intel Core i7-1250U
Intel Iris Xe (iGPU)
1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0
17.3″ / 12.5”
Max Refresh Rate
How We Review
Update the detailed information about Apple Needs An Oled Supplier, But Can It Sidestep Samsung? on the Katfastfood.com website. We hope the article's content will meet your needs, and we will regularly update the information to provide you with the fastest and most accurate information. Have a great day!